RESTORING THE RIGHT OF REDRESS TO THE FIRST AMENDMENT
Our Founding Fathers placed the political protections in the First Amendment for a reason. They knew just like England our government would one day oppress the redress of government wrongs.
President Bush and Congress made a Law making it unlawful to sue telecommunication companies for conspiring with government against the Fourth Amendment so the government can unlawfully listen to all communications without Due Process of obtaining a warrant. This Law was made in violation of the commanded protection of the RIGHT OF REDRESS BY THE PEOPLE in the First and Seventh Amendment.
President Clinton and Congress made Laws for the specific purpose of OPPRESSING the Constitutionally protects privilege of habeas corpus. The habeas corpus was a safety placed in the constitution to protect the people from an over Zealous government. If a person takes the safety off of a gun with a deliberate disregard for the life of others the courts would throw the book at them, not Complicity cover it up.
I have made many Lawful CHALLENGES of Laws made by Congress in violation of the FIRST AMENDMENT. The courts have been complicit and are enabling an ongoing conspiracy to oppress the Commanded Protection of the RIGHT OF REDRESS in the FIRST AMENDMENT by refusing to give these Laws a test as presented in USA v. Butler, 297 US 1, at page 62 that states;
"The Constitution is the supreme law of the land ordained and established by the people. All legislating must conform to the principles it lays down. When an act of Congress is appropriately challenged in the courts as not conforming to the constitutional mandate the judicial branch of the Government has only one duty, -to lay the article of the Constitution which is invoked beside the statue which is challenged and to decide whether the latter squares with the former. All the court does, or can do , is to announce it's considered judgment upon the question."
Marbury v. Madison, 5 CRANCH 137, at page 180 is clear; "that a Law repugnant of the constitution is void; and that courts, as well as other departments, are bound by that instrument." As persons working under the U.S. Constitution, all persons of government are bound by that instrument.
All persons who have ever been a part of government including judges have taken oath 5 USC 3331 which states; "I, AB, do solemnly swear (or affirm) that I will support and defend the Constitution of the United States against all enemies, foreign and domestic: that I will bear true faith and allegiance to the same:"
Article 6, Clause 2 and 3 along with the oath of office makes it the Lawful duty of every person in every department to support and defend the Constitution even if the courts are complicit or enable this ongoing conspiracy to oppress Civil Liberties to facilitate and fester. This is wrong as it is our judges who are suppose to be the true guardians of the integrity of the Constitution.
"To be liable as a conspirator you must be a voluntary participant in a common venture, although you need not have agreed on the details of the conspiratorial scheme or even know who the other conspirators are. It is enough if you understand the general objectives of the scheme, accept them, and agree either explicitly or implicitly, to do your part to further them."Jones v. City of Chicago, 856 F.2d 985
If you believe in the integrity of the US Constitution I ask you to contact me and help me compel the courts to give a full and fair redress of these First Amendment Challenges on the record. Forward this site to anyone you believe I a true Constitutional Patriot. I have these challenges in the Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals and the District Court of South Carolina. I need every Constructional Patriot out there to demand redress of this challenge.